Scam Reports Degen.com Active 226 views View on BitcoinTalk
I deposited $250 at the casino, then placed sports bets, winning 12, losing six, and losing two. Of these bets, there were also two doubles and four bets on the World Championship. A few days ago, I placed a $602 withdrawal. The withdrawal was immediately approved, but the funds didn't appear in my wallet for several hours. I contacted support, who informed me that their provider had decided to cancel my bets because they were placed on a weak line. What was the line's weakness? Are you retroactively deciding what's weak and what isn't? I bet on what I wanted, and you suggest I bet on it. Please note that this complaint only appeared after I submitted the withdrawal request, suggesting that the casino apparently simply doesn't want to pay out, citing the provider's fault. I immediately warned the casino that I would withdraw my deposit as they suggested, but then I would start filing disputes on resources I knew. Especially since when I checked the same Bitcointalk, I was surprised to find several identical complaints from other users. A dubious coincidence, don't you think? I'm attaching screenshots of the correspondence and my bets.

Login: leparda

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image

Posted image
Edited Aug 19, 2026 11:14 by admin
Report to moderator

Is it scam?

This report is over 30 days old. Members vote Yes or No. The side with more votes wins after at least 3 votes.

Comments (54)

We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.

As soon as we were notified that a formal case had been opened against us, we responded there and have been providing the mediator with our evidence and a full account of the events. We believe the ADR process is the appropriate place for disputes of this nature, where all evidence can be reviewed impartially, rather than conducting the case across multiple public platforms.

We have noticed a number of comments stating or implying that the player's deposits were taken. That is incorrect. The player was offered a refund of their deposit, accepted it, and successfully withdrew the funds. This is one of several facts that will be presented as part of the ADR process.

Out of respect for the ongoing mediation, we will keep our detailed submissions within the ADR process and will abide by its outcome.
Report to moderator
We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.

As soon as we were notified that a formal case had been opened against us, we responded there and have been providing the mediator with our evidence and a full account of the events. We believe the ADR process is the appropriate place for disputes of this nature, where all evidence can be reviewed impartially, rather than conducting the case across multiple public platforms.

We have noticed a number of comments stating or implying that the player's deposits were taken. That is incorrect. The player was offered a refund of their deposit, accepted it, and successfully withdrew the funds. This is one of several facts that will be presented as part of the ADR process.

Out of respect for the ongoing mediation, we will keep our detailed submissions within the ADR process and will abide by its outcome.
I try to stay impartial and not take sides until all the information comes out. I seen holydarkness mention the CH investigation and decided to wait til that was concluded. I appreciate you guys responding and if a situation arises again and it's being pursued through CH, just let users know that you are responding on that platform and keep the speculation to a minimum.
Report to moderator
I deposited $250 at the casino, then placed sports bets, winning 12, losing six, and losing two. Of these bets, there were also two doubles and four bets on the World Championship. A few days ago, I placed a $602 withdrawal. The withdrawal was immediately approved, but the funds didn't appear in my wallet for several hours. I contacted support, who informed me that their provider had decided to cancel my bets because they were placed on a weak line. What was the line's weakness? Are you retroactively deciding what's weak and what isn't? I bet on what I wanted, and you suggest I bet on it. Please note that this complaint only appeared after I submitted the withdrawal request, suggesting that the casino apparently simply doesn't want to pay out, citing the provider's fault. I immediately warned the casino that I would withdraw my deposit as they suggested, but then I would start filing disputes on resources I knew. Especially since when I checked the same Bitcointalk, I was surprised to find several identical complaints from other users. A dubious coincidence, don't you think? I'm attaching screenshots of the correspondence and my bets.
If you wanted 100% impartiality (or as close to it as possible), why did you use the "Contest Hunters" website?

Did you know the Degen campaign manager is behind it?

We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.
Was it you that notified AB de Royse777 to create the thread to investigate if the negative tag was justified? If you did not, do you know who did?

If it was you, did you intentionally ask AB de Royse777 to create the thread while you intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process. If so, why did you query the negative tag when that too could have waited until after the Contest Hunters ADR process was complete?

Having said that, I had never heard of “Contest Hunters” until earlier today when it was mentioned in a recent post and then it was also mentioned that Little Mouse is behind it. Keeping in mind Little Mouse is your campaign manager (therefore the conflict of interest is right there for all to see), even though you stated it was not you that instigated the case the outcome will be interesting.
Report to moderator
If you wanted 100% impartiality (or as close to it as possible), why did you use the "Contest Hunters" website?
Did you know the Degen campaign manager is behind it?
'Little Mouse' is the owner of ContestHunters, but he doesn't take care of the dispute there. 'holydarkness' work as an independent mediator in ContestHunters. He is a trusted and reliable person in that case, which has been proven by his activity on the scam accusation board here over the past few years. I think you also respect the judgement of 'holydarkness' which he makes by looking into the facts and evidence.

Was it you that notified AB de Royse777 to create the thread to investigate if the negative tag was justified? If you did not, do you know who did? ~
It was 'Little Mouse' who asked him to look into the feedback.
Report to moderator
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?

Yes, I received the deposit back even before filing the complaint. I did state that I accepted the casino's offer to return the deposit, but I also gave notice that I would subsequently open a dispute on the platforms known to me. In my view, this does not change the essence of the matter at all. I agreed to the return of a portion of my money, not to the casino's resolution of the issue. And importantly, I made this context clear right from the start in our correspondence.
Report to moderator
We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.
Who? I see a Scam Accusation on Bitcointalk (where you're advertising a signature campaign), not on a commercial third party website, and you decide not to respond here?

Let me quote the third party site without rewarding them with a backlink:
Quote
Error: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL /disputes/13 from this server.

As soon as we were notified that a formal case had been opened against us
Do you even know what "formal" means? There's nothing formal about a commercial third party site!

Quote
we responded there and have been providing the mediator with our evidence and a full account of the events. We believe the ADR process is the appropriate place for disputes of this nature, where all evidence can be reviewed impartially, rather than conducting the case across multiple public platforms.
You're kidding, right? The spammers who earn from you and shoot the messenger instead of responding to the scam accusation are far from impartial:
a business who is spending $6,000 to $8,000 a month on their campaigns with this community

We have noticed a number of comments stating or implying that the player's deposits were taken.
Really? Please back up your claim by quoting those comments, because I don't see them (including the title).

Quote
The player was offered a refund of their deposit, accepted it, and successfully withdrew the funds.
Strongarming someone into accepting a partial payment doesn't make things right. Giving winners back only their deposit and keeping money from losers is not right.

Quote
Out of respect for the ongoing mediation, we will keep our detailed submissions within the ADR process and will abide by its outcome.
How much did you pay this "impartial" party since you came to this forum?
Report to moderator
Let me quote the third party site without rewarding them with a backlink:
Quote
Error: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL /disputes/13 from this server.

  I can access it.

Apart from that, I understand some of the points you are making but did you miss this?

ContestHunters are run by LM, yes, I think he and some of his friends [be it on the forum or on his personal life] build it and facilitate the platform with dispute resolution page. But, so far, he has not intervene with any of it and give me the freedom as much as I want to prove and piece evidences. Though I haven't ventured around the platform to see what it offers, I'd like to think that dispute department is a separate section, completely run by me, with LM's help to get me acquainted with a contact, suppose they're still not in mine.

You seem a lot more emotional than usual—not thick-skinned—.
Report to moderator
I can access it.
I'm using Tor browser for this.

Quote
did you miss this?
I saw holydarkness' post, but still see no reason to move this topic to a third party site.

Quote
You seem a lot more emotional than usual—not thick-skinned—.
You're the one who's being paid by this site, not me. I don't have skin in the game. What's with the personal attack instead of addressing the scam accusation?
Report to moderator
You're the one who's being paid by this site, not me. I don't have skin in the game. What's with the personal attack instead of addressing the scam accusation?

I am being paid by the site but not for much longer I think. It's not a personal attack, it's an observation, I would think the same if I was wearing another signature or not a signature at all.

You are not always thick-skinned and that's a fact, you also get winded up in some AI-related matters. Maybe that means you are human after all.

About the Scam Accusation, I think it is BS not to pay people their profits because they are value betting or whatever they are calling it. I made money playing poker for a long time precisely by value betting.
Report to moderator
About the Scam Accusation, I think it is BS not to pay people their profits because they are value betting or whatever they are calling it. I made money playing poker for a long time precisely by value betting.
It's 100% bullshit. They offer the bet, they took the money, they look for a way not to pay. This community has just accepted whatever a casino says without really pushing back. If a casino doesn't want a players business, pay them and close their account seems like the correct action.

As I have stated dozens of times in multiple threads, a decent number of accusations in this section are bs, but there are accusations that I deem proper. Value betting IMO is 1 of the accusations I've seen that I disagree with, but the community has accepted it so I haven't tagged casinos using this excuse as scam operations. Maybe that needs to change?

a business who is spending $6,000 to $8,000 a month on their campaigns with this community
Royse has only ever cared about his pocket, not the community.
Report to moderator
It's 100% bullshit. They offer the bet, they took the money, they look for a way not to pay. This community has just accepted whatever a casino says without really pushing back. If a casino doesn't want a players business, pay them and close their account seems like the correct action.

And the fact is that even that—which is an unfair advantage for the house—is accepted in sports betting (if they detect that a player is winning a lot, they can close the account, but they still have to pay out whatever the player has won). At least in poker, it has never worked that way.
Report to moderator
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?

Yes, I received the deposit back even before filing the complaint. I did state that I accepted the casino's offer to return the deposit, but I also gave notice that I would subsequently open a dispute on the platforms known to me. In my view, this does not change the essence of the matter at all. I agreed to the return of a portion of my money, not to the casino's resolution of the issue. And importantly, I made this context clear right from the start in our correspondence.

I will stop right here, before I spend my time reading their counter-evidence, cross-referencing things, and do all that I need to do to get a verdict on CH if your intention is to open dispute on the platforms [plural] that you know. I don't want to waste my time and risking a migraine to make a call that will only resulted in you moving to other ADR, then to other, then to other, until one says you're the right one.

So, if the verdict on ContestHunters will not be binding to you and you already planned to go into platforms known to you until you get a win, please spare me the time and say it right now before I scrutinize details given by Degen, so I can remove those evidence from my device and mark your case as rejected on CH, safe us all a lot of time and energy.
Report to moderator
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?

Yes, I received the deposit back even before filing the complaint. I did state that I accepted the casino's offer to return the deposit, but I also gave notice that I would subsequently open a dispute on the platforms known to me. In my view, this does not change the essence of the matter at all. I agreed to the return of a portion of my money, not to the casino's resolution of the issue. And importantly, I made this context clear right from the start in our correspondence.

I will stop right here, before I spend my time reading their counter-evidence, cross-referencing things, and do all that I need to do to get a verdict on CH if your intention is to open dispute on the platforms [plural] that you know. I don't want to waste my time and risking a migraine to make a call that will only resulted in you moving to other ADR, then to other, then to other, until one says you're the right one.

So, if the verdict on ContestHunters will not be binding to you and you already planned to go into platforms known to you until you get a win, please spare me the time and say it right now before I scrutinize details given by Degen, so I can remove those evidence from my device and mark your case as rejected on CH, safe us all a lot of time and energy.


What I'm talking about is that I notified the casino that I would open a dispute on the platforms I know after processing my deposit. Which I did, writing in this section. I'm not saying I'm about to open multiple disputes. That makes no sense, of course. And you yourself recommended posting on ContestHunters in other similar complaints about this casino, which is what I did.
Report to moderator
I will stop right here, before I spend my time reading their counter-evidence, cross-referencing things, and do all that I need to do to get a verdict on CH if your intention is to open dispute on the platforms [plural] that you know. I don't want to waste my time and risking a migraine to make a call that will only resulted in you moving to other ADR, then to other, then to other, until one says you're the right one.

So, if the verdict on ContestHunters will not be binding to you and you already planned to go into platforms known to you until you get a win, please spare me the time and say it right now before I scrutinize details given by Degen, so I can remove those evidence from my device and mark your case as rejected on CH, safe us all a lot of time and energy.

What I'm talking about is that I notified the casino that I would open a dispute on the platforms I know after processing my deposit. Which I did, writing in this section. I'm not saying I'm about to open multiple disputes. That makes no sense, of course. And you yourself recommended posting on ContestHunters in other similar complaints about this casino, which is what I did.

I see and duly noted.

This shall be the beginning of the binding mediation on CH, where the verdict shall be honored by all the parties involved. I'll begin reading and inspecting the materials they provided. Please wait a little.
Report to moderator
So whatever lines we win on can be termed as 'weak' and they will easily confiscate both deposit +winnings ??

This is some absolute BS happening on these new sites.

We dont see these type of things happen ever on sites like stake,shuffle etc. No wonder they are the industry leaders now.

Pretty obvious these new books dont want to payout any winnings and just there to take in deposits. Disgusting behaviour

Actually... "sites like Stake, shuffle, etc." uhh, Stake doesn't respond to scam accusation on this forum anymore, so pretty much all of the complaint against them, it's "we've made a call, and everyone shall obey." This is especially true to another big industry-leader casino like Betcoin who dismisses cases with response that does not open to negotiation or a room to wiggle for a mutual-understanding, of which... arguably understandable from an industry leader casino like Betcoin who have one of the cleanest record on my list. They buit their reputation not only from being here for more than a decade, but also from being casino who can prove that they're the one being wronged and the player tried to cheat them.

But I observed other casino, that's on a speed-track to "industry leader casino" through big promo on the forum, also attempted to do the same method to dismiss matter, "You do this, we have evidence for it, no, it's not for debate, end of discussion," thinking that [I strongly assume] birthed from their thought that huge marketing presence on the forum only is enough to dismiss cases without providing their own counter evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

So... yeah, these type of things happen ever on big sites because they dismiss without bothering to convince the forum, due to their big name and long-standing reputation. Question is, do same benefit-of-doubt and taking-word-at-face-value applied the same to a relatively new casino just because they hold massive marketing promo and freebies on the forum? Hold sig. campaign managed by big name?

Sorry for going OOT, just showing that reputation and benefit of doubts should not be given just because they're industry leader [or hold many promos], it should be earned through time of cooperating with each complaint and being transparent... until their words can be taken for granted.

To be fair i havent seen the 'player bet on weak line' argument before, either from stake/shuffle or anyone else

Looks like a new betby thing maybe?

Perhaps the newer sites like degen etc dont have dedicated sports risk analysis/sports head honchos yet who have the knowledge and authority to over ride betby call

Now i think about it, its more likely to me its betby and casinos just going with it.
 
Weak line is the exact same thing as a value bet.
Report to moderator

Sign in to post a comment.

← Back to home

Other Incidents (45)

Mkpool.com Active

[WARNING] Be careful with MKPOOL / mkpool.com

8 views Aug 18, 2026
Stake.com Active

STAKE Scam , funds stucked from last 3YEARS

26 views Aug 18, 2026
Stake.com Active

STAKE INR DEPOSITS PENDING!! NO OFFICIAL HELP FROM STAKE

12 views Aug 17, 2026
Shuffle.com Active

Subject: [SCAM ACCUSATION] Shuffle.com blocked my account, withheld my money and

10 views Aug 17, 2026
Cloudbet.com Active

Cloudbet froze ~$2,100 after self-exclusion / multiple accounts

20 views Aug 16, 2026
Stake.com Active

Stake Temporary Suspension

14 views Aug 14, 2026
Winz.io Active

SCAM ALERT My Experience with Winz.io – Over €1,000 in Winnings Confiscated

42 views Aug 14, 2026
Hitbtc.com Active

HitBTC refuses offboarding & traps $548 in infinite KYC [Ticket #1670599]

16 views Aug 14, 2026
Kucoin.com Active

[SCAM] KUCOIN, STOLEN FUNDS suicide reason

41 views Aug 13, 2026
Bc.game Active

Bank Account Lien Resulting from INR Withdrawal from BcGame

60 views Aug 13, 2026
Hashfactory.io Active

[Warning] Hashfactory.io is another fake cloud mining service!!!

41 views Aug 11, 2026
Rollbit.com Active

DISPUTE] Rollbit refuses to pay out my balance under false accusations

11 views Aug 09, 2026
Kikabet.com Active

kikabet scam

101 views Aug 09, 2026
Polybiusrecovery.com Active

Crypto recovery scam - polybiusrecovery.com

10 views Aug 08, 2026
Duckdice.io Active

DuckDice.io - Account blocked & funds confiscated after KYC

9 views Aug 07, 2026
Bitmart.com Active

BitMart Exchange scammed all users

136 views Aug 06, 2026
Htx.com Scam Confirmed

[WARNING] HTX (Huobi) holding 3800.1 USDT

15 views Aug 06, 2026
Bc.game Active

Bcgame scammed me INR 4900000

274 views Jul 25, 2026
Dedprz.com Active

SCAM ACCUSATION: dedprz.com confiscated settled winnings

32 views Jul 25, 2026
12play.com Active

12PLAY asia biggest scam for 25,701 SGD

20 views Jul 24, 2026
Shuffle.com Active

Shuffle.com Refuse to Pay 400$

63 views Jul 24, 2026
Stake.com Active

Stake.com lies about promotions...

36 views Jul 24, 2026
Duel.com Active

Duel.com

32 views Jul 22, 2026
Fortunejack.com Active

FortuneJack confiscated 12,000+ BRL sports betting winnings over temporary share

20 views Jul 21, 2026
Gamdom.com Active

Gamdom (this is how they really treat people)

99 views Jul 21, 2026
N.exchange Active

N.exchange holds 6,000 USDT for 4 years after sending them to Binance in 17 min

33 views Jul 19, 2026
Betplay.io Active

Warning: Betplay.io ignores confirmed self-exclusion for gambling addiction

35 views Jul 13, 2026
Bitz.io Active

bitz.io confiscated my winnings

70 views Jul 11, 2026
Mellstrgame78.com Active

[FAKE SCAM CASINO] Mellstroy Casino - mellstrgame78.com

49 views Jul 10, 2026
Coinlocally.com Active

[SCAM] CoinLocali - Withholding $3,000 in user funds for 2 years

96 views Jul 09, 2026
Bk8.com Active

[scam] BK8 blocked the account after I won big prize in slot

66 views Jul 09, 2026
Other Active

[SCAM] Thunderpick (Napier Ltd) - Disabled VIP account "nongrata" to steal $787.

23 views Jul 08, 2026
Luckyanon.com Active

Luckyanon.com is a scam and is stealing around $1000

23 views Jul 07, 2026
Toshi.bet Active

toshi.bet Scam casino

20 views Jul 06, 2026
Degen.com Active

Degen Casino refuses to pay 513.98 USDT Sportsbook winnings

62 views Jul 06, 2026
Other Active

FixedFloat — 0.0851 BTC frozen, no timeline, no answers (Order ZNTBD7)

70 views Jul 05, 2026
Degen.com Active

Degen.com Confiscated My Winnings

146 views Jul 03, 2026
Other Active

GhostSwap unresolved swap case — 12.441 ETH (ID 41gf6aamcb79iw8o)

761 views Jul 03, 2026
Shuffle.com Active

[UNRESOLVED] Shuffle.com Withholding Funds

29 views Jul 03, 2026
Winna.com Active

WARNING ABOUT WINNA - 0 customer support - Waiting for over 80 days

34 views Jul 01, 2026
Stake.com Active

Stake.com System Error! Rejected Bet Approved Later and My Balance is Gone €652

70 views Jul 01, 2026
Rainbet.com Active

€12,000 stuck at RainBet, dispute closed "Unresolved." What are my options?

161 views Jun 05, 2026
Tomboi.exchange Scam Confirmed

Tomboi exchange - SCAM 100K$

72 views Jun 05, 2026
Bc.game Scam Confirmed

Bc game account blocked withdraw suspended

63 views Jun 05, 2026
Changenow.io Scam Confirmed

⚠️SCAM⚠️ Changenow.io illegally holding 440,000$ and not releasing it ! ⚠️SCAM⚠️

109 views Jun 05, 2026