What happened:

In June 2021, we entered into a Listing Agreement with P2PB2B for the ARTG token under their "Luxury Package" (15,000 USDT), which included community development and marketing services.

Within 6 months (December 2021), we formally identified and documented multiple issues:

– Out of 500 promised Telegram posts, only ~100 could be identified
– The majority of links provided as proof were non-functional
– The 10,000 direct messages report was inaccessible
– The 200 guerrilla marketing actions were not verifiable
– The 1,000 Telegram comments were not delivered or could not be verified

Additionally:

– In September 2021, screenshots provided as evidence referred to a completely different project ("SCX Digital Asset Fund"), not ARTG

Over the following years (2021–2026):

– Multiple requests for clarification and proof were ignored for extended periods
– At the time (December 2021), their team acknowledged that accounts used for Telegram activity had been banned
– In October 2024, their representative stated: "the manager responsible for these services doesn't work here anymore and that is why it takes so much time"

In May 2025:

– A proposal was made to compensate the missing services
– No follow-up or execution was ever provided

In July 2026:

– A formal complaint was submitted through official channels with a 14-day deadline
– No response has been received

Entity Involved:

P2PB2B Exchange — operated by Partida Services OÜ (Estonia, registry code 14572266)

Reference Link:

https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/6a986905b5da575974c1ff06

Amount:
15,000 USDT (paid under Listing Agreement No. 02/06/2021 – services not properly delivered or verifiable)

Payment Method:
Cryptocurrency (USDT)

Proof of Payment:
Available upon request

PM/Chat Logs:
Full Telegram communication history (2021–2026) preserved and available upon request

Additional Notes:

– Partial or non-delivery of paid services
– Use of incorrect reporting evidence (unrelated project)
– Long-term failure in communication and account management
– Unfulfilled remediation commitments

Regulatory transparency observations:

– The UK entity (Partida Technologies LLP) associated with P2PB2B was dissolved in September 2021
– The exchange operates via Partida Services OÜ (Estonia)
– No publicly verifiable CASP authorization or confirmed MiCA compliance has been identified

All supporting documentation is available and can be shared if required.

This thread is intended to document the case transparently and allow the counterparty to respond.

When scam accusations regarding the service were posted here. Some of you undermined them and continued to do business with them anyway. Over 7 years later, here you come after finally noticing some foul play.

Look at these accusations, for example – BEWARE OF SUPER SCAM: P2PB2B claim to be worlds biggest exchange, And there are several others in this board alone. You just have to do the right search (https://bitlist.co/search?content=p2pb2b&board_id=83&only_topic_starter=true&limit=20&sort_by=date_asc

There is nothing much we can do for you except feel sorry for your loss.

well, guess what? if you work with scammers, you get scammed, shocking 

i just want to know why you would wait for so long... years... to post a negative review and make a scam accusation?

Quote from: JMMP on September 03, 2026, 06:23:30 PM

Entity Involved:

P2PB2B Exchange — operated by Partida Services OÜ (Estonia, registry code 14572266)

looks like the company has been abandoned since 2019: https://ariregister.rik.ee/est/company/14572266

Quote from: JMMP on September 03, 2026, 06:23:30 PM

This thread is intended to document the case transparently and allow the counterparty to respond.

good luck with that.

Spending even $100 to gain exposure on such a disreputable exchange is too much. Though that is hardly surprising if you are unaware of the many negative allegations surrounding it, including major false claims, trading volume manipulation, questionable corporate licensing, a lack of team transparency, and so on.

Quote from: RGBTC on September 03, 2026, 11:12:51 PM

Spending even $100 to gain exposure on such a disreputable exchange is too much.

You will be surprised how the owner can still believe they're gonna gain some exposure. I once handled a promotion for my project, these spammer-offering AMA Telegram send directly a message to our CEO. Then, my CEO sent me a message to handle it. I already told him it's not gonna to bring any exposure and he still insisted me to do it and you want to know how much the price? 350$. I make negotional with him, and make the price down from 350 to 200$ even without approval/request from my owner.

My experience working as mod, any post from account listing services from: P2PB2B, Lalatoken, Upbit, and some other exchange who are using listing service spam to join and spam every project. I ban them instantly. I mean, if they're a good exchange with good volume and have such a huge user base. Why need to spam every project to list a token/coins on their exchange. They're just tried milking project with listing fees + token allocation only.

Thank you for the feedback.

To clarify, the issues were formally documented and raised with P2PB2B as early as December 2021, shortly after the campaign.

This thread was created now as a structured and documented record after multiple attempts to resolve the matter directly over several years.

The reference to the Estonian registry entry is noted and consistent with the regulatory transparency concerns outlined in the original post.

All supporting documentation is available and will be provided if the counterparty responds.

Quote from: ryzaadit on September 04, 2026, 12:27:09 AM

My experience working as mod, any post from account listing services from: P2PB2B, Lalatoken, Upbit, and some other exchange who are using listing service spam to join and spam every project. I ban them instantly. I mean, if they're a good exchange with good volume and have such a huge user base. Why need to spam every project to list a token/coins on their exchange. They're just tried milking project with listing fees + token allocation only.

Most platforms that promote their listing services like this usually end up the same way. They target project managers who want cheap token listings instead of paying high fees to big CEX exchanges, But they don't realize that listing on platforms with a bad reputation can hurt the project especially if there is little real trading volume.. Investors may also get scammed on these platforms, even if the token itself is legitimate.

Many projects that later turned out to be scams promised listings and then chose unknown exchanges to take people’s money. Their fees are much lower than big exchanges, so they can attract new teams.

It's good that OP exposed them so others know to stay away.