Hi everyone,

We are currently seeking liquidity partners for our casino, targeting up to $1,000,000 USD in total liquidity for the next 18 months, distributed across multiple contributors.

🌐 Casino: https://wasabi.casino

📣 ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5563229.60

Liquidity Terms

Liquidity providers receive up to 50% of Net Gaming Revenue (NGR)Minimum lock period: 60 days — 30% NGR shareLock period of 3+ months: 50% NGR shareThis structure prioritizes longer-term partners while remaining flexible for contributors with different risk profiles.
Transparency & Fund Security
Full transparency into operational proceduresAll funds held in escrowEscrow funds are released fractionally on a daily basis, limited strictly to operational requirements for that day
Minimum investment : $3k

If you are an experienced investor or operator seeking revenue-sharing exposure in the casino space, please review the ANN thread and reach out directly.

Quote from: CryptSafe on December 24, 2025, 11:25:34 PM

It is not a bad idea to bring his investment proposals here, ....

If you actually read the OP, he clearly mentioned “experienced investors.” So he’s obviously targeting people who already have experience investing in casino-related projects. Those of us who haven’t invested in casinos in recent years probably won’t really relate to this.

Personally, my own experience with casino bankroll investing goes way back, around 2016 to 2017, when dice games were still popular. I was also active during the ICO days, investing in gambling projects by buying their ETH-based tokens. That was a very different time compared to now.

Quote from: Distinctin on December 24, 2025, 07:42:30 AM

Quote from: God Of Thunder on December 23, 2025, 09:35:48 AM

They said $3K, but they again said it's $15K. I hope they will reply you with corrected information.

They reduced the minimum investment because someone suggested it on the previous page.  If you check the OP, it was originally set at $3k.

The real question is, did the OP actually manage to get any investors who trusted the platform?

It would be good to get some kind of update on that, if possible.

No one from here yet. But if interested I'd be happy to provide more info.

Quote from: Sanitough on December 24, 2025, 11:32:38 PM

Quote from: CryptSafe on December 24, 2025, 11:25:34 PM

It is not a bad idea to bring his investment proposals here, ....

If you actually read the OP, he clearly mentioned “experienced investors.” So he’s obviously targeting people who already have experience investing in casino-related projects. Those of us who haven’t invested in casinos in recent years probably won’t really relate to this.

Personally, my own experience with casino bankroll investing goes way back, around 2016 to 2017, when dice games were still popular. I was also active during the ICO days, investing in gambling projects by buying their ETH-based tokens. That was a very different time compared to now.

While we prefer experienced investors, this is not a strict requirement provided the investment is made with a clear understanding of the risks and structure. also beside escrow we can have official contract, even if someone is willing to have his own license and willing to pay for it himself we can provide the platform and shared bankroll with the person.

Update:
The bankroll remains largely unchanged since this post.

Contact email is : support@wasabi.casino

Quote from: michellee on December 24, 2025, 12:39:44 PM

$3k still big for the minimum investment especially for those who don't have much money but want to have investments. If they can lower the minimum investment below $500-$1000, that will give people more chances to join.

I don't think it's too big an amount for an investor. For an investor, it's a tiny amount. Most of us aren't investors, but generally players, which is why it may look like a big amount. If a casino accepts $500 investment, they could do it via their website, where the players will have options to make a deposit and stake it on the bankroll. I think we have seen such casinos before, which have a feature to invest in bankroll. But Wasabi isn't raising the funds in the same way I described. They are looking for private investors who would trust them and send funds directly to the Wasabi team instead of making a deposit.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on December 25, 2025, 07:09:03 AM

Quote from: michellee on December 24, 2025, 12:39:44 PM

$3k still big for the minimum investment especially for those who don't have much money but want to have investments. If they can lower the minimum investment below $500-$1000, that will give people more chances to join.

I don't think it's too big an amount for an investor. For an investor, it's a tiny amount. Most of us aren't investors, but generally players, which is why it may look like a big amount. If a casino accepts $500 investment, they could do it via their website, where the players will have options to make a deposit and stake it on the bankroll. I think we have seen such casinos before, which have a feature to invest in bankroll. But Wasabi isn't raising the funds in the same way I described. They are looking for private investors who would trust them and send funds directly to the Wasabi team instead of making a deposit.

We also have that feature, but its been challenging to market it https://wasabi.casino/rushgame/5minRush

Quote from: asvsfs on December 25, 2025, 01:10:59 AM

While we prefer experienced investors, this is not a strict requirement provided the investment is made with a clear understanding of the risks and structure. also beside escrow we can have official contract, even if someone is willing to have his own license and willing to pay for it himself we can provide the platform and shared bankroll with the person.

It seems you haven't answered about escrow, or am I missing the part? Point me if I am missing. I doubt you'll get bankroll investment from the forum since you haven't built your reputation here. As far as I know there are a couple of investors, but I doubt they will engage with you unless you fail to build their trust. Also haven't seen any marketing activities across the forum; not sure if there are any marketing activities off-forum.

Regarding escrow, unless it's a forum-trusted escrow, then most probably no one is going to invest in your bankroll at all. Off-forum escrow aren't welcomed on the forum, and we really don't trust them. You may choose your team members, or you may build an escrow site, but how do we trust them? Unless you specify the whole investment system, there is less hope of getting investors from the forum.

Quote from: Sanitough on December 24, 2025, 11:32:38 PM

Quote from: CryptSafe on December 24, 2025, 11:25:34 PM

It is not a bad idea to bring his investment proposals here, ....

If you actually read the OP, he clearly mentioned “experienced investors.” So he’s obviously targeting people who already have experience investing in casino-related projects. Those of us who haven’t invested in casinos in recent years probably won’t really relate to this.

Personally, my own experience with casino bankroll investing goes way back, around 2016 to 2017, when dice games were still popular. I was also active during the ICO days, investing in gambling projects by buying their ETH-based tokens. That was a very different time compared to now.

You are right. OP stated so, but we all know this is business, and there are still some people who would want to invest in the business so they can make a profit from it, irrespective of the fact that they do not have knowledge and experience when it comes to the casino business, but they may have patience and understanding if properly explained to them.

Maybe for certain reasons, OP came up with such a condition so that people without the experience know their boundaries, as not all investors are patient with the process to fully evolve to something good and profitable.

Quote from: The Cryptovator on December 25, 2025, 08:11:39 AM

Quote from: asvsfs on December 25, 2025, 01:10:59 AM

While we prefer experienced investors, this is not a strict requirement provided the investment is made with a clear understanding of the risks and structure. also beside escrow we can have official contract, even if someone is willing to have his own license and willing to pay for it himself we can provide the platform and shared bankroll with the person.

It seems you haven't answered about escrow, or am I missing the part? Point me if I am missing. I doubt you'll get bankroll investment from the forum since you haven't built your reputation here. As far as I know there are a couple of investors, but I doubt they will engage with you unless you fail to build their trust. Also haven't seen any marketing activities across the forum; not sure if there are any marketing activities off-forum.

Regarding escrow, unless it's a forum-trusted escrow, then most probably no one is going to invest in your bankroll at all. Off-forum escrow aren't welcomed on the forum, and we really don't trust them. You may choose your team members, or you may build an escrow site, but how do we trust them? Unless you specify the whole investment system, there is less hope of getting investors from the forum.

Escrow is an open source smart contract reviewable by anyone, but what do you mean by forum-trusted escrow ? which one is that ?

Quote from: asvsfs on December 26, 2025, 02:01:10 AM

Escrow is an open source smart contract reviewable by anyone, but what do you mean by forum-trusted escrow ? which one is that ?

He is referring to a forum-based escrow service provider that has been in operation for a while and has established its trust by successfully handling escrow transactions in the past. There are a couple of highly trusted forum members who offer escrow services, which you can also utilize. Even the forum admin kept the forum funds to other members, and one of them is OgNasty. I also heard of another member who had died, actually, and the forum wasn't able to recover its funds after his death. But as long as the forum investors trust the escrow service provider, you should not have any problem.

Quote from: God Of Thunder on December 26, 2025, 04:26:51 AM

Quote from: asvsfs on December 26, 2025, 02:01:10 AM

Escrow is an open source smart contract reviewable by anyone, but what do you mean by forum-trusted escrow ? which one is that ?

He is referring to a forum-based escrow service provider that has been in operation for a while and has established its trust by successfully handling escrow transactions in the past. There are a couple of highly trusted forum members who offer escrow services, which you can also utilize. Even the forum admin kept the forum funds to other members, and one of them is OgNasty. I also heard of another member who had died, actually, and the forum wasn't able to recover its funds after his death. But as long as the forum investors trust the escrow service provider, you should not have any problem.

Yeah, you are right and I personally think that any transaction that has to do with members of this forum should be completely kept within this forum, like when such a transaction involves getting an escrow on board, forum escrow is the best to go for as this ones have been tested and highly trusted, and fee structure is also clear to avoid any confusion.

And to comment on the forum escrow who passed and the forum wasn't able to recover the funds in his possession, I have not heard or read anywhere of this incident but it's possible I missed it.
But I think for a large amount belonging to the forum,  one forum member shouldn't be entrusted to hold such fund, there should be a multi-sig wallet where atleast, 4 to 6 trusted forum users will be appointed to be a signatory of the wallet for this forum, this can help incase a member passes, funds can still be accessed.

Quote from: Fivestar4everMVP on December 26, 2025, 06:33:00 AM

And to comment on the forum escrow who passed and the forum wasn't able to recover the funds in his possession, I have not heard or read anywhere of this incident but it's possible I missed it.

I think I was able to come across the thread titled paraipain coin on the move, where the forum funds were moving even after the forum member's death. The guy actually died, but someone from his family or friends actually moved the funds somewhere else, and the forum lost that money. OgNasty was holding a large amount of funds as well, and he was getting fees too. But theymos decided to get back the funds and I think OgNasty do not hold any funds anymore. There was controversy about the forked coins claims as well, which is why we have been seeing a fight between Vod and OgNasty for a while.

Hi Again,

I tried this for a while, didn't really work out well, been busy with other works after, trying again soon with a new launch, any serious gambler here any interest to micro invest in bankroll? Not an ask just opinion.

I don’t think the bankroll investment model will work that well for a casino today, especially if most of the funding will only come from micro-investors.

The competition is already much tougher now. Casinos need serious capital for marketing, promotions, licensing, staff, liquidity, and everything else needed to survive. If the bankroll is built mostly from small investments, then the business itself may also remain too small to compete with established platforms.

Maybe this model worked better before, when the market was not yet this crowded. But today, I think you should consider changing the approach and look for one or a few serious investors instead of relying heavily on micro-investors.

Otherwise, people might just end up wasting both their money and time on a casino that may struggle to survive.

Quote from: Botnake on August 01, 2026, 04:10:48 AM

I don’t think the bankroll investment model will work that well for a casino today, especially if most of the funding will only come from micro-investors.

The competition is already much tougher now. Casinos need serious capital for marketing, promotions, licensing, staff, liquidity, and everything else needed to survive. If the bankroll is built mostly from small investments, then the business itself may also remain too small to compete with established platforms.

Maybe this model worked better before, when the market was not yet this crowded. But today, I think you should consider changing the approach and look for one or a few serious investors instead of relying heavily on micro-investors.

Otherwise, people might just end up wasting both their money and time on a casino that may struggle to survive.

Agree it won't be competitive, but I'm looking for a new way of excitement there, and this won't be the only bankroll for sure, It's more of a staking solution to have a cut of house-edge, if house invest 100k and players invest 50k , 33% of the house edge will be distributed among players, stake/unstake will be daily basis( you get to choose how many days you lock your fund) so its also a risk and fun to watch how it plays out.

Other model is hosting your own game with your own capital and see how it plays out.

I'm looking for a sustainable new fun way to gamble, gambling is an expensive business now with little innovation.

Quote from: asvsfs on August 01, 2026, 04:35:37 AM

Quote from: Botnake on August 01, 2026, 04:10:48 AM

I don’t think the bankroll investment model will work that well for a casino today, especially if most of the funding will only come from micro-investors.

The competition is already much tougher now. Casinos need serious capital for marketing, promotions, licensing, staff, liquidity, and everything else needed to survive. If the bankroll is built mostly from small investments, then the business itself may also remain too small to compete with established platforms.

Maybe this model worked better before, when the market was not yet this crowded. But today, I think you should consider changing the approach and look for one or a few serious investors instead of relying heavily on micro-investors.

Otherwise, people might just end up wasting both their money and time on a casino that may struggle to survive.

Agree it won't be competitive, but I'm looking for a new way of excitement there, and this won't be the only bankroll for sure, It's more of a staking solution to have a cut of house-edge, if house invest 100k and players invest 50k , 33% of the house edge will be distributed among players, stake/unstake will be daily basis( you get to choose how many days you lock your fund) so its also a risk and fun to watch how it plays out.

Other model is hosting your own game with your own capital and see how it plays out.

I'm looking for a sustainable new fun way to gamble, gambling is an expensive business now with little innovation.

Well, if that is really your setup, then at least you still believe your casino program can be competitive.

Maybe you just need to clearly explain all your plans and proposals, so you can attract serious investors.

You also need to show how the invested funds will be protected. I just want to ask if your casino already has a license, because that would give investors some kind of assurance. What happens if something goes wrong with their money?

Quote from: asvsfs on August 01, 2026, 03:18:30 AM

Hi Again,

I tried this for a while, didn't really work out well, been busy with other works after, trying again soon with a new launch, any serious gambler here any interest to micro invest in bankroll? Not an ask just opinion.

Well, I had to spend hours reading posts in your Ann thread that's in the altcoins section To understand the purpose of your casino token. Have you seen how many casino tokens are successful? You'll see something very scary. The best token (I'm only talking about "best" according to the position the casino token occupies on CoinMarketCap at the time of my post) is in position number 230. Look at that, position 230, it's not a very high position When you look at Bitcoin, which is in position 1 and there are tokens and altcoins that are in positions much lower than 230.

See the positions of the casino tokens:

1 - Shuffle ( position 230 )

2 - Rollbit Coin ( position 237 )

3 - BFG Token ( position 1134 )

source: https://coinmarketcap.com/view/gambling/

And see how these 3 casinos have been operating for several years and have a solid customer base. But even so, the positions of their tokens are not the best. This shows the high level of difficulty for casino tokens to be widely accepted in the market.

And yet you went ahead and created a casino token, knowing that your casino was new, didn't have a fixed customer base, and to make matters worse, you set a high minimum investment: "$3000". Let's think about this together: how many people are going to invest $3000 in a newly created casino when there are many other, slightly safer investments available?

My point with this post is the following:

You made a series of mistakes that you could have avoided if you had focused more on the present. The best approach is always to create a project with your own funds, and after it's finished, come back and post here to show good results without complaining. People don't invest in projects that have complaints from the creator.