Login: leparda


































This report is over 30 days old. Members vote Yes or No. The side with more votes wins after at least 3 votes.
[...]
leparda, Hello. Change the thread title to .
He should probably wait until the money is in his pocket.
[...]
[...]
leparda, Hello. Change the thread title to .
He should probably wait until the money is in his pocket.
[...]
The remaining fund has been returned, as per few hours ago, I've informed the player on CH [as it seems OP do follow the recommendation and focused there and barely online here after case being moved there] so he can withdraw immediately.
I will closely monitor from both ends [CH and checking from degen's rep] to see if the fund moved, and would encourage OP to return to the forum and mark this as resolved by then.
Though, at this point, the case should be as good as resolved, given the fund is ready for OP to be transferred to his wallet.
Glad you got your money, now you should probably lock this thread since your case is over.[...]
leparda, Hello. Change the thread title to .
He should probably wait until the money is in his pocket.
[...]
The remaining fund has been returned, as per few hours ago, I've informed the player on CH [as it seems OP do follow the recommendation and focused there and barely online here after case being moved there] so he can withdraw immediately.
I will closely monitor from both ends [CH and checking from degen's rep] to see if the fund moved, and would encourage OP to return to the forum and mark this as resolved by then.
Though, at this point, the case should be as good as resolved, given the fund is ready for OP to be transferred to his wallet.
I'll write this here as well. I confirm that I have received the $352 (including the deposit refund, which totals the $601 discussed earlier). I now have no financial claims against Degen Casino. Thank you for your assistance!
Let's hear what their REP has to say about all this as I like to see both sides to a story. If your version is correct, then negative trust is warranted but let's not go there yet. Degencom could you pop in and give us your version, thx.
I donÂt think that Betby should be involved in any payment. If a sportsbook isnÂt happy with the lines, they should just change providers. A weak line (value line or soft line) can be caused for multiple reasons. It could be a slow moving line and players make the bet before the line changes. Those are called steam players. All the book has to do is delay approving the bet. Many books do that. It can also be that the line is unique or opinionated.To me its plain - IF there is a weak line(whatever the hell that may be), that is supplied by betby and the player has nothing to do with it.
Why are the players put at fault ? Betby should be the one to compensate whatever amounts the sites lose due to these 'weak lines'
what evidence did you need to look at? The bet and line is all you needed. ThereÂs nothing private. If you donÂt have the line history the book can show you the percentage that the line is off from widely available. Post that percentage.[...]
If we are now talking about him reviewing the evidence from both parties on a website that was created by a campaign manager and him being the sole adjudicator and the one that has the final say on whether the claimant was scammed or the casino was not guilty, that is a different matter altogether. I appreciate him being the middle-man in an attempt at conflict resolution but I do not support any one member (regardless of who that member might be) to make a decision that is binding between both parties.
[...]
Ooff... that'll be a bit awkward situation here, given my binding decision after reading all the evidence is to get Degen to pay the difference between amount disputed and what's already returned as initial deposit, amounted in 352 USD.
I mean, we're really close to conflict resolution attempt here, it's sad if that has to go down the drain because a situation where I become the conciliator [it's the term they used there, not "adjudicator"] is not supported. I personally don't mind, less stress for me. The work I do, to read all the evidences and piecing the puzzles, are no different than what I do here, but [if I may borrow the closest euphemism, though in no way I am saying I wear it] heavy is the head that wear the crown.
Being the one who make the final call is not easy, especially if you're neutral, because other people from the other side who doesn't like the call, or simply have a personal agenda, can use that verdict-making as a way to attack me.
So... yeah, a bit awkward here, given my call is to reimburse the difference, and if it has to go down the drain, as I don't think same offer can be achieved elsewhere. And sure, we can get people to not use CH to resolve Degen's cases [or any other casinos cases], and when the casino is silent or non-responsive, we can tag and flag them. But will that be a satisfactory outcome to the player who lose their fund? If they may choose to get refunded through a binding decision or to get the casino tagged because escalation to a specific ADR is frowned upon, I wonder what would they choose.
I deleted one post. If I misread and the player was paid in full then I apologize and holy did a good job. Was the player paid 100% of his winnings? ItÂs confusing since this would be the first time that holy disagreed with the odds provider. Holy said the odds providers make the call and the book is the middleman.I think that Jolly Good makes a lot of great points. I donÂt think that giving a book a discount is success. ItÂs just helping books to continue a predatory practice where they donÂt pay full price to winners but take 100% from losers.
A discount, you fucking mongoloid? Not only can't you read, but you can't do math either. So it's no surprise you're spouting that nonsense.
what evidence did you need to look at?
Its irrelevant. Per usual, HD does not owe you a response. I don't know why you still fail to understand this. Stop trying to throw wrenches in his cases.
leparda, Hello. Change the thread title to .
He should probably wait until the money is in his pocket.
I've removed the tag for now, and I think holydarkness's help was far more significant in this matter than his fee. I don't think I'd have the patience to act as a peacemaker and would probably prefer to find another job altogether.
These are all valid points that some people seem to take for granted.
Sign in to post a comment.