Login: leparda


































This report is over 30 days old. Members vote Yes or No. The side with more votes wins after at least 3 votes.
I try to stay impartial and not take sides until all the information comes out. I seen holydarkness mention the CH investigation and decided to wait til that was concluded. I appreciate you guys responding and if a situation arises again and it's being pursued through CH, just let users know that you are responding on that platform and keep the speculation to a minimum.We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.
As soon as we were notified that a formal case had been opened against us, we responded there and have been providing the mediator with our evidence and a full account of the events. We believe the ADR process is the appropriate place for disputes of this nature, where all evidence can be reviewed impartially, rather than conducting the case across multiple public platforms.
We have noticed a number of comments stating or implying that the player's deposits were taken. That is incorrect. The player was offered a refund of their deposit, accepted it, and successfully withdrew the funds. This is one of several facts that will be presented as part of the ADR process.
Out of respect for the ongoing mediation, we will keep our detailed submissions within the ADR process and will abide by its outcome.
If you wanted 100% impartiality (or as close to it as possible), why did you use the "Contest Hunters" website?I deposited $250 at the casino, then placed sports bets, winning 12, losing six, and losing two. Of these bets, there were also two doubles and four bets on the World Championship. A few days ago, I placed a $602 withdrawal. The withdrawal was immediately approved, but the funds didn't appear in my wallet for several hours. I contacted support, who informed me that their provider had decided to cancel my bets because they were placed on a weak line. What was the line's weakness? Are you retroactively deciding what's weak and what isn't? I bet on what I wanted, and you suggest I bet on it. Please note that this complaint only appeared after I submitted the withdrawal request, suggesting that the casino apparently simply doesn't want to pay out, citing the provider's fault. I immediately warned the casino that I would withdraw my deposit as they suggested, but then I would start filing disputes on resources I knew. Especially since when I checked the same Bitcointalk, I was surprised to find several identical complaints from other users. A dubious coincidence, don't you think? I'm attaching screenshots of the correspondence and my bets.
Was it you that notified AB de Royse777 to create the thread to investigate if the negative tag was justified? If you did not, do you know who did?We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.
'Little Mouse' is the owner of ContestHunters, but he doesn't take care of the dispute there. 'holydarkness' work as an independent mediator in ContestHunters. He is a trusted and reliable person in that case, which has been proven by his activity on the scam accusation board here over the past few years. I think you also respect the judgement of 'holydarkness' which he makes by looking into the facts and evidence.If you wanted 100% impartiality (or as close to it as possible), why did you use the "Contest Hunters" website?
Did you know the Degen campaign manager is behind it?
It was 'Little Mouse' who asked him to look into the feedback.Was it you that notified AB de Royse777 to create the thread to investigate if the negative tag was justified? If you did not, do you know who did? ~
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?
Who? I see a Scam Accusation on Bitcointalk (where you're advertising a signature campaign), not on a commercial third party website, and you decide not to respond here?We have intentionally refrained from responding in this thread while the matter is being handled through the Contest Hunters ADR process.
QuoteError: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL /disputes/13 from this server.
Do you even know what "formal" means? There's nothing formal about a commercial third party site!As soon as we were notified that a formal case had been opened against us
You're kidding, right? The spammers who earn from you and shoot the messenger instead of responding to the scam accusation are far from impartial:Quotewe responded there and have been providing the mediator with our evidence and a full account of the events. We believe the ADR process is the appropriate place for disputes of this nature, where all evidence can be reviewed impartially, rather than conducting the case across multiple public platforms.
a business who is spending $6,000 to $8,000 a month on their campaigns with this community
Really? Please back up your claim by quoting those comments, because I don't see them (including the title).We have noticed a number of comments stating or implying that the player's deposits were taken.
Strongarming someone into accepting a partial payment doesn't make things right. Giving winners back only their deposit and keeping money from losers is not right.QuoteThe player was offered a refund of their deposit, accepted it, and successfully withdrew the funds.
How much did you pay this "impartial" party since you came to this forum?QuoteOut of respect for the ongoing mediation, we will keep our detailed submissions within the ADR process and will abide by its outcome.
Let me quote the third party site without rewarding them with a backlink:
QuoteError: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL /disputes/13 from this server.
ContestHunters are run by LM, yes, I think he and some of his friends [be it on the forum or on his personal life] build it and facilitate the platform with dispute resolution page. But, so far, he has not intervene with any of it and give me the freedom as much as I want to prove and piece evidences. Though I haven't ventured around the platform to see what it offers, I'd like to think that dispute department is a separate section, completely run by me, with LM's help to get me acquainted with a contact, suppose they're still not in mine.
I'm using Tor browser for this.I can access it.
I saw holydarkness' post, but still see no reason to move this topic to a third party site.Quotedid you miss this?
You're the one who's being paid by this site, not me. I don't have skin in the game. What's with the personal attack instead of addressing the scam accusation?QuoteYou seem a lot more emotional than usualÂnot thick-skinnedÂ.
You're the one who's being paid by this site, not me. I don't have skin in the game. What's with the personal attack instead of addressing the scam accusation?
It's 100% bullshit. They offer the bet, they took the money, they look for a way not to pay. This community has just accepted whatever a casino says without really pushing back. If a casino doesn't want a players business, pay them and close their account seems like the correct action.About the Scam Accusation, I think it is BS not to pay people their profits because they are value betting or whatever they are calling it. I made money playing poker for a long time precisely by value betting.
Royse has only ever cared about his pocket, not the community.a business who is spending $6,000 to $8,000 a month on their campaigns with this community
It's 100% bullshit. They offer the bet, they took the money, they look for a way not to pay. This community has just accepted whatever a casino says without really pushing back. If a casino doesn't want a players business, pay them and close their account seems like the correct action.
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?
Yes, I received the deposit back even before filing the complaint. I did state that I accepted the casino's offer to return the deposit, but I also gave notice that I would subsequently open a dispute on the platforms known to me. In my view, this does not change the essence of the matter at all. I agreed to the return of a portion of my money, not to the casino's resolution of the issue. And importantly, I made this context clear right from the start in our correspondence.
Expediting the case resolution successful, as can be witnessed, the casino has replied on CH very recently. OP, can you confirm that you withdraw the initial deposit that they returned?
Yes, I received the deposit back even before filing the complaint. I did state that I accepted the casino's offer to return the deposit, but I also gave notice that I would subsequently open a dispute on the platforms known to me. In my view, this does not change the essence of the matter at all. I agreed to the return of a portion of my money, not to the casino's resolution of the issue. And importantly, I made this context clear right from the start in our correspondence.
I will stop right here, before I spend my time reading their counter-evidence, cross-referencing things, and do all that I need to do to get a verdict on CH if your intention is to open dispute on the platforms [plural] that you know. I don't want to waste my time and risking a migraine to make a call that will only resulted in you moving to other ADR, then to other, then to other, until one says you're the right one.
So, if the verdict on ContestHunters will not be binding to you and you already planned to go into platforms known to you until you get a win, please spare me the time and say it right now before I scrutinize details given by Degen, so I can remove those evidence from my device and mark your case as rejected on CH, safe us all a lot of time and energy.
I will stop right here, before I spend my time reading their counter-evidence, cross-referencing things, and do all that I need to do to get a verdict on CH if your intention is to open dispute on the platforms [plural] that you know. I don't want to waste my time and risking a migraine to make a call that will only resulted in you moving to other ADR, then to other, then to other, until one says you're the right one.
So, if the verdict on ContestHunters will not be binding to you and you already planned to go into platforms known to you until you get a win, please spare me the time and say it right now before I scrutinize details given by Degen, so I can remove those evidence from my device and mark your case as rejected on CH, safe us all a lot of time and energy.
What I'm talking about is that I notified the casino that I would open a dispute on the platforms I know after processing my deposit. Which I did, writing in this section. I'm not saying I'm about to open multiple disputes. That makes no sense, of course. And you yourself recommended posting on ContestHunters in other similar complaints about this casino, which is what I did.
Weak line is the exact same thing as a value bet.So whatever lines we win on can be termed as 'weak' and they will easily confiscate both deposit +winnings ??
This is some absolute BS happening on these new sites.
We dont see these type of things happen ever on sites like stake,shuffle etc. No wonder they are the industry leaders now.
Pretty obvious these new books dont want to payout any winnings and just there to take in deposits. Disgusting behaviour
Actually... "sites like Stake, shuffle, etc." uhh, Stake doesn't respond to scam accusation on this forum anymore, so pretty much all of the complaint against them, it's "we've made a call, and everyone shall obey." This is especially true to another big industry-leader casino like Betcoin who dismisses cases with response that does not open to negotiation or a room to wiggle for a mutual-understanding, of which... arguably understandable from an industry leader casino like Betcoin who have one of the cleanest record on my list. They buit their reputation not only from being here for more than a decade, but also from being casino who can prove that they're the one being wronged and the player tried to cheat them.
But I observed other casino, that's on a speed-track to "industry leader casino" through big promo on the forum, also attempted to do the same method to dismiss matter, "You do this, we have evidence for it, no, it's not for debate, end of discussion," thinking that [I strongly assume] birthed from their thought that huge marketing presence on the forum only is enough to dismiss cases without providing their own counter evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
So... yeah, these type of things happen ever on big sites because they dismiss without bothering to convince the forum, due to their big name and long-standing reputation. Question is, do same benefit-of-doubt and taking-word-at-face-value applied the same to a relatively new casino just because they hold massive marketing promo and freebies on the forum? Hold sig. campaign managed by big name?
Sorry for going OOT, just showing that reputation and benefit of doubts should not be given just because they're industry leader [or hold many promos], it should be earned through time of cooperating with each complaint and being transparent... until their words can be taken for granted.
To be fair i havent seen the 'player bet on weak line' argument before, either from stake/shuffle or anyone else
Looks like a new betby thing maybe?
Perhaps the newer sites like degen etc dont have dedicated sports risk analysis/sports head honchos yet who have the knowledge and authority to over ride betby call
Now i think about it, its more likely to me its betby and casinos just going with it.
Sign in to post a comment.