Edited Oct 27, 2026 03:03
In a sane world, Ben Zhou doesn't have that say, he should bury his face in shame.Ben Zhou said what he said, and said what he believed right thing to do for waking up Pi fans or people who are attracted by Pi. He does a right thing and I respect him for this action.Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.
Ben Zhou did not simply talk it for fun, and many people did not talk about it for fun. They did it with their deeply and heartfully willingness to help others, but it's up to you and others to continue their belief and bets in Pi coin.QuoteTalk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.
I don't know if there's something issue with regulation happening on why we see most of casino tokens struggle to be added on big exchange.
I also tried to view some tokens which is under gambling category https://coinmarketcap.com/view/gambling/ Β have big volumes and I see Arcadeum which got $30m volume which also been listed on Bitget,gate.io,HTX and Lbank which is somehow a decent exchange.
Quotehttps://indir-zpf.com/zclkvisitor/87258d98-f8e1-11ef-96f3-128b85a0e2eb/d11f3a10-2cff-11ec-b832-0aea8b85a94f?campaignid=bd41fbd0-d4d7-11ef-b8f4-12832fc4c381
I just finished reading the cointelegraph article that you shared, and from what I read there, I learnt that Ben Zhou was angered by a post from an X user who has no affiliation with Pi network, who claimed that bybit KYB request to Pi network as a way to get verified to list Pi was rejected, this angered the CEO of Binance whom in response accused pi network of being a scam.In a sane world, Ben Zhou doesn't have that say, he should bury his face in shame.Ben Zhou said what he said, and said what he believed right thing to do for waking up Pi fans or people who are attracted by Pi. He does a right thing and I respect him for this action.Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.
Ben Zhou did not simply talk it for fun, and many people did not talk about it for fun. They did it with their deeply and heartfully willingness to help others, but it's up to you and others to continue their belief and bets in Pi coin.QuoteTalk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.
If someone is to be countered and even be behind bars, it should be him with the cheating and atrocities being performed with their platform, especially the global branch. You may not notice this many of them, but I do daily, this guy is a huge bucket shop, deceit and swindlers, so I wonder what such like him would advise me on a project that is doing better than hundreds of what he had listed that I would believe.
Fine, there were allegations but I wonder why the government has not dealt harshly with Pi Network but allowed it to eventually list after many investigations. You are the enemy if you don't cooperate with the big guys, that's what I see here.
You may read this: https://cointelegraph.com/news/pi-network-responds-bybit-scam-claims
This can be a most funniest accusation I have ever known of. A centralized exchange has to do KYC to a project, to list that coin on their exchange. Jesus, is it how an open blockchain for everyone should work. With smart contract, you can add it to your exchange if you want, nothing to do KYC to a project. I don't think that reason from Pi network team makes any sense, and I believe that Ben Zhou did not do any KYC to Pi Network team for listing offer, and he was not angry when making that post.I just finished reading the cointelegraph article that you shared, and from what I read there, I learnt that Ben Zhou was angered by a post from an X user who has no affiliation with Pi network, who claimed that bybit KYB request to Pi network as a way to get verified to list Pi was rejected, this angered the CEO of Binance whom in response accused pi network of being a scam.
I believe he was professional by saying this fact and I see his action is like what CZ did to say fact about FTX years ago.QuoteAs much as the reason for the CEO doing or saying what he said was understandable, it's still very unprofessional of him to move on to lay such accusations without first making sure to verify every fact and ensure they are all authentic, really unprofessional considering his person and his value/importance to the society and the cryptocurrency community at large, boils down to the fact that no man is an island of knowledge no matter how influential they are.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1c51ac6bf2439cb9876aab736df695afa2f0ff8b8c75ba33136ba20c50609a23Quoteπ₯ 28,362 RLB was just bought & burned ($2,240) π₯
Hourly revenues:
Casino: $13,595 π²
Sports: $2,605 β½
Trading: $2,027 π
Burned Today: 1,503,402 RLB ($115.7K)
Burned This Week: 10,277,826 RLB ($787.0K)
Burned This Year: 597,123,922 RLB ($52.8M)
Lifetime Burn: 938,255,813 RLB ($102.9M)
Supply burnt: 55.87%
If you read how Pi Network is being painted badly by some outlets, you may run away from it as far as your leg would take you, but the opposite is the reality, $Pi is doing really great.Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.Pi is a scam coin in a way how it was created, shilled in communities, and many activities so far.I didn't say what I said to justify what exchanges are doing, they could be idiotic at times and political for whatever reason they have. Lately, people started calling out those big exchanges regarding $Pi and even Coinmarketcap because, for about 2 weeks now, $Pi has been unjustly rated.
At a point, it was at over #3200 position despite holding a self-reporting $10B MC, which got to over $17B at a point. It is now $11B and still ranked #201 at the time of writing. Holding as low as that for that long is not justified.
The same goes for CEXs, for their peculiar reasons, they list nonsense coins/tokens and do not list better ones. You can imagine when TON was listed on Binance compared to the time it was launched and doing well in the market. It's beyond any factor we can think of.
Do anyone see it is very ironicallly that how a scam coin team and its communities borrow an exchange listing to say it is not a scam coin?
And they use another reason, it has a main net launch after years of development, and say it is not a scam coin, another hilarious explanation.
With open source code, it's easy to create aΒ scam coin, and their let's say 'main net blockchain' is like shit.
It plus with a basic Ponzi scheme of Pi coin, gives me enough reason to conclude that is a scam coin, forever scam coin.
Don't forget scam coins like Bitconnect or Onecoin. Pi coin is one of such Ponzi scam coin and it's uncomparable with RLB token built and supported by Rollbit.
Talk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.
You might want to read:
1. https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/pi-network-crypto (Not A Scam)
2. https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/20237625559105 (Not proven a scam, just speculation)
3. https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/what-is-pi-network (Not classified as a scam project)
I don't think the issue about Pi is financial scamming like they are doing ponzi scheme model. But the growing concern before is they are just collecting data which provably could cause harm for people doing it beforeΒ https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/14735376441073
Not only Rollbit amd Duelbits I have not found many other casino sites on his website that have been around for a long time with a good enough reputation. I don't know what factors he takes into account when he lists casino sites on his site. Maybe he has personal interest here like he takes money for listing. And sites that don't agree to pay aren't listed there. or maybe he doesn't know much about these sites and doesn't see them as potential. so they could not be listed on his siteHello Rollbit, where do you have your license? We would like to update our records with the correct information.
It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
He's probably listing the sites periodically or since I noticed that most of the links on the website are affiliate or referral links. Maybe that's what he is chasing, so he's giving priority to sites that offer juicer affiliate programs.It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
Not only Rollbit amd Duelbits I have not found many other casino sites on his website that have been around for a long time with a good enough reputation. I don't know what factors he takes into account when he lists casino sites on his site. Maybe he has personal interest here like he takes money for listing. And sites that don't agree to pay aren't listed there. or maybe he doesn't know much about these sites and doesn't see them as potential. so they could not be listed on his siteHello Rollbit, where do you have your license? We would like to update our records with the correct information.
It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
He is probably running an elaborate referral program judging by the casinos listed there which I do not see the basis for their selection. I know two popular casinos there whose referral links are littered all over the Internet, they were among the first casinos listed there which shows it was more about the referral program than the reputation of the casinos. Not seeing Rollbit in that lust made me lose interest in whatever he was saying.He's probably listing the sites periodically or since I noticed that most of the links on the website are affiliate or referral links. Maybe that's what he is chasing, so he's giving priority to sites that offer juicer affiliate programs.It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
I have seen such platforms give even more popular or trustworthy casinos poor player rating vs their favorite less know casinos.
Yes, sometimes someone looks more at what they will get when they start making a casino list, one of which is a referral program. We also can't blame someone when they release their casino list, because we have different thoughts and usually have certain goals.He is probably running an elaborate referral program judging by the casinos listed there which I do not see the basis for their selection. I know two popular casinos there whose referral links are littered all over the Internet, they were among the first casinos listed there which shows it was more about the referral program than the reputation of the casinos. Not seeing Rollbit in that lust made me lose interest in whatever he was saying.He's probably listing the sites periodically or since I noticed that most of the links on the website are affiliate or referral links. Maybe that's what he is chasing, so he's giving priority to sites that offer juicer affiliate programs.
I have seen such platforms give even more popular or trustworthy casinos poor player rating vs their favorite less know casinos.
He is probably running an elaborate referral program judging by the casinos listed there which I do not see the basis for their selection. I know two popular casinos there whose referral links are littered all over the Internet, they were among the first casinos listed there which shows it was more about the referral program than the reputation of the casinos. Not seeing Rollbit in that lust made me lose interest in whatever he was saying.He's probably listing the sites periodically or since I noticed that most of the links on the website are affiliate or referral links. Maybe that's what he is chasing, so he's giving priority to sites that offer juicer affiliate programs.It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
I have seen such platforms give even more popular or trustworthy casinos poor player rating vs their favorite less know casinos.
Well, the truth remains that majority, if not all the review platforms we have around center on their own pocket first before they talk about or consider reputation, I can tell you that 100 percent of those who build review platform do it as an investment or business which the expect to make money back from, this is true if we consider how much money actually goes into developing a good review platform.He is probably running an elaborate referral program judging by the casinos listed there which I do not see the basis for their selection. I know two popular casinos there whose referral links are littered all over the Internet, they were among the first casinos listed there which shows it was more about the referral program than the reputation of the casinos. Not seeing Rollbit in that lust made me lose interest in whatever he was saying.He's probably listing the sites periodically or since I noticed that most of the links on the website are affiliate or referral links. Maybe that's what he is chasing, so he's giving priority to sites that offer juicer affiliate programs.It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.
I have seen such platforms give even more popular or trustworthy casinos poor player rating vs their favorite less know casinos.
I do agree but I think they could also do better in transparency, after all this is about review and so the criteria for their reviews should be specified more. This doesnΓΒt really affect their list to me rather give many insights on how these Casinos were picked.So, If I must be honest with you, you know the popular saying which states that the best form of judgement is to judge yourself first, I personally won't blame or judge anyone who create a review platform and decide to make money off it through embedding referral links to the casino links in his or her review, it's the same thing any of us here would do.
And also understand that as a new platform, it is normal that most casinos won't get listed immediately, such things take time but then, many of us lack patience.
Whether it's listed on the site or not doesn't really matter to the Rollbit team, but the way such site operate just outlines why members need to be careful when picking a casino based on their random reviews.But I don't really find anything important on this listing since provably that Rollbit management won't care much about this. They have other means to promote their casino and they are so successful on each marketing they have done. Maybe better for people to pay attention with their post on X since lots of great things happened there there https://x.com/rollbit
Sign in to post a comment.